A reader writes in about Hansen’s submission at the Kingsnorth trial. I’m posting up a thread under a couple of conditions. Hansen’s take on scientific matters is influential and important and discussion of scientific topics will be permitted. Please do not post on anything that remotely touches on policy. Please do not make posts complaining or whining about Hansen or AGW or alarmism or anything like that. I’m not going to bother snipping, I’m just going to delete posts that don’t comply. Using words like Cenozoic in the post is encouraged.
Is Steve or anyone interested in taking a look at Hansen’s written submission in the Kingsnorth trial?
It’s online here:
http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/files/pdfs/climate/hansen.pdf
Excerpts from his Q & A are here:
http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/kingsnorth-day-three-trial-jim-hansen-20080903
Written statements from the other defence witnesses are here:
http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/climate/kingsnorth-trial-witness-statements-full-20080912
